- Affected NYC condos and co-ops owe 4% to 6.5% of assessed value over the next two tax years, and unpaid charges become a lien that follows the property.
- Commercial office and retail condos and standard Class 2 rentals are outside the surcharge, while small mixed-use buildings and LLC or trust structures need case-by-case review.
- Compass Commercial’s Trystan Polsinelli argues the cost could steer some buyers toward rental walk-ups and commercial condos, while lawsuits still threaten how the city collects the money.
Compass Commercial’s Trystan Polsinelli argues in a Commercial Observer column that New York City’s pied-à-terre surcharge should shape deal talks.
It is an opinion piece, not a legal guide. Polsinelli says each point should go past an attorney or tax adviser.
Get Smarter About What Matters in New York
Subscribe to our free newsletter covering the biggest commercial real estate stories across the five boroughs — delivered in just 5 minutes.
Tax or Surcharge?
The city projected about $500M a year in new revenue from the measure. The mayor, Zohran Mamdani, described it as a tax at launch, yet the statute’s term is surcharge.
That matters in court. One set of suits questions whether the money can be kept outside the constitutional cap on city property taxes, and another challenges how the city picked properties that might owe it.
What It Costs
For the next two tax years, through 2027-28, affected condos and co-ops owe 4% to 6.5% of the city’s assessed value, not the sale price.
Owners of second homes may also lose an abatement. In a co-op, the bill runs through the corporation, so one owner’s unpaid charge can become the building’s problem.
The charge, plus penalties and interest, becomes a lien, so a sale doesn’t erase the exposure. A nonprofit’s property tax exemption may not shield it either.
What’s Out of Scope
The surcharge doesn’t reach commercial office or retail condos, or standard Class 2 rental buildings. A few smaller mixed-use buildings fall under Class 1, which calls for a building-by-building look.
Polsinelli argues that rental walk-ups with ground-floor retail, and commercial condos, may look better to buyers as the cost of owning surcharged apartments becomes clear.
Deal Mechanics
Status on Jan. 5 drives the charge, so an intent to occupy or lease doesn’t alter it, and the contract should say who pays. A qualifying primary-residence tenant under an arm’s-length lease of a year or more can qualify a unit for an exemption.
LLC and trust ownership needs a close look at who holds the interests and who lives there. Someone occupying the unit doesn’t settle the question.
Why It Matters
CRE Daily has tracked the policy fight. WSJ reporting we covered found the tax targets homes worth $5M or more owned by people living mostly elsewhere, with city audits removing 10,000 apartments from a lost abatement program and one owner facing a $101,000 yearly surcharge.
Sellers need to be able to explain where a property stands. Buyers need to know which costs come with it.
What’s Next
The legal outcome is still open. As CRE Daily reported from Bloomberg, a Brooklyn appeals court paused a Sept. 29 ruling that had blocked the rollout and promised a decision by Nov. 10.
