- Oksenholt Capital is pushing back on City Office REIT’s planned merger with affiliates of Elliott Capital, calling the deal a “liquidation sale” that undervalues the company’s true worth.
- The investment firm is demanding new independent board members, US-based leadership, and a full strategic restructuring to restore City’s value and position in the Sun Belt office market.
- City’s stock has fallen nearly 75% from its 2022 highs, and Oksenholt claims that current management—especially CEO James Farrar—has failed to provide effective solutions amid continued underperformance.
- Oksenholt Capital proposes a cost-saving and growth strategy, including leasing reforms, better asset management, and competitive bidding for any future transactions.
A Showdown Over City Office REIT’s Future
Oksenholt Capital Management has gone public with sharp criticism of City Office REIT’s board and executive team, reports BusinessWire. The firm is calling for major changes in leadership and strategy. It is also urging shareholders to vote “no” on the company’s pending acquisition by affiliates of Elliott Capital (MCME Carell). In a detailed letter sent to CIO’s board chair, CEO Jon Oksenholt accused City’s leadership of mismanagement and of pushing a lowball deal without transparency or competitive bidding.
Investor Rebellion: “We’ve Lost Confidence”
The Arizona-based investment firm revealed it now owns hundreds of thousands of CIO shares—more than CEO James Farrar—making it a significant shareholder. Oksenholt slammed Farrar for earning over $2.3M in 2024 despite presiding over a sharp decline in stock value. City’s share price plummeted from $21.24 in 2022 to $5.57 by July 2025, wiping out over $600M in market cap.
Oksenholt Capital says it has “lost confidence in City’s present leadership” and criticized the board for failing to act decisively as shareholder value eroded. It also called out the company’s focus on ESG messaging over financial performance and shareholder accountability.
Get Smarter about what matters in CRE
Stay ahead of trends in commercial real estate with CRE Daily – the free newsletter delivering everything you need to start your day in just 5-minutes
A “Liquidation Sale” Behind Closed Doors
Oksenholt strongly opposes the pending sale to MCME Carell. The firm claims the deal was negotiated privately, with no competitive process. It also argues that the offer severely undervalues the company. Oksenholt pegs City’s true book value closer to $15 per share, nearly triple the pre-merger price. It argues that the merger offer fails to maximize shareholder value.
Instead of selling to private equity on what it describes as unfavorable terms, Oksenholt is calling for an open bidding process. The firm believes this would allow better offers to emerge.
The Fix-It Plan
In its letter, Oksenholt laid out a detailed action plan to turn around the REIT:
- Cut $2–$7M in annual wasteful spending
- Reinvest savings into physical asset improvements and tenant retention
- Bring leasing in-house and reduce reliance on third-party vendors like JLL
- Cancel all Canadian office operations and shift leadership to be fully US-based
- Improve asset marketing and launch long-term capital plans
- Maintain and grow the current dividend through increased operational efficiency
It also calls for a full review of the company’s real estate holdings—especially underutilized land and parking—to unlock additional value.
The Call For New Leadership
Beyond operational reforms, Oksenholt wants a clean slate at the top. It is calling for new independent directors and a new US-based CEO. The firm also wants to end compensation structures that reward executives during periods of underperformance. It also raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest tied to the current management’s administrative agreements.
What’s Next
Oksenholt Capital says it remains committed to CIO’s long-term success and is open to presenting its plan directly to the board. It’s urging shareholders to reject the current merger deal and back a strategic shift to unlock the company’s full potential as a leading Sun Belt office REIT.
As shareholder activism grows in the public REIT space, this could signal a broader trend. Investors are increasingly pushing back against management teams and buyouts they believe undervalue long-term assets.