- South Florida cities are transferring public land at no cost to developers for affordable housing.
- Miami and West Palm Beach have executed high-profile deals, with land valued at millions ceded to private groups.
- Critics question transparency, but supporters cite the necessity due to rising construction costs.
- Projects target residents earning 30 to 80 percent of area median income.
Land-for-Affordability Deals Expand
South Florida municipalities are increasingly tackling the affordable housing crisis by transferring city-owned land to developers for free. The Real Deal reports that the practice aims to spark new construction but has ignited debate over public incentives and accountability.
Miami recently transferred parcels worth over $8M to Swerdlow Group, Nir Shoshani, and Nuri Dorra. The sites will support affordable housing in Little Havana. Officials executed the deals last year under former commissioner Joe Carollo without competitive bidding. As a result, both city leaders and residents raised concerns about transparency and process. Still, current commissioner Rolando Escalona chose to move the projects forward. He avoided leaving the lots idle. At the same time, he added public oversight to $12M in developer subsidies.
Get Smarter about what matters in CRE
Stay ahead of trends in commercial real estate with CRE Daily – the free newsletter delivering everything you need to start your day in just 5-minutes
West Palm Beach Follows Suit
West Palm Beach has also transferred five city-owned parcels for a planned 151-unit affordable housing development by Trè Bèl Procida Development Group. The city upzoned the land, allowing denser, seven-story buildings and boosting incentives for new housing. Like the Miami projects, units target residents earning 30 to 80 percent of area median income, as institutional capital continues to increase its focus on income-restricted housing amid rising demand and limited supply.
Why It Matters
Affordable housing costs remain high, with construction prices straining development pipelines. Supporters of these land-for-affordability swaps argue that removing land costs is essential to make projects viable. However, the practice raises questions about transparency, public benefit, and the long-term impact on city assets.
What’s Next
As affordable housing pressure mounts, other cities may consider similar strategies. The ongoing debate will likely focus on finding the right balance between boosting affordable housing supply and ensuring accountability in public-private partnerships.
